Should the uk retain its uncodified

The Bill of Rights in America is a way of safeguarding rights because it enables its citizens to know and use these rights to be able to defend themselves should they need to such as in Should the uk retain its uncodified.

On the other hand a codified constitution would clarify the nature of the political system to its citizens. An uncodified constitution is unwritten, or at least not written all in one document.

The introduction of a codified constitution means that the set of rules are made clearer leaving no error through not having a clear concept of the constitution. Because of this many people tend to regard Britain as being politically backward because we do not have a codified constitution and therefore have not yet entered the modern world.

In the UK currently the people have the ability the put pressure on the government to make changes to the constitution for example the powers of the House of Lords were reduced through both Parliament acts of and because of a growing belief that an unelected second chamber should no longer have the right to block the policies of an elected government.

In conclusion I believe that the UK should retain its current uncodified constitution namely because there is no real necessity to do so as of yet. The UK is a part of the European Union which means that as the constitution is not codified, it makes relations with the rest of the EU difficult, especially in trying to create coherent relations with Europe.

I believe that the constitution in the UK should retain its current uncodified system.

Britain is unusual so to speak in not having a codified constitution. Essay Sample A constitution is a set of rules which may be written or unwritten, establishes the distribution of power in a political system, the limits of government jurisdiction, the rights of citizens and the method of amending the constitution itself.

More essays like this: Whereas our current constitution is flexible — open to interpretation, as well as having the quality of being organic the constitution is rooted in society and not separate from society and quickly and easily adapting to changes in the situation as in the case of the anti-terror legislation after the attacks on London.

For example in the USA the bill of rights is a part of their constitution and every citizen can gain access to these rights. Currently in the UK the government adopted the European Convention on Human Rights by passing the human rights act in ; however this is still incredibly weak and can still be overridden by Parliament.

Judicial tyranny means that judges have power of supreme arbiter over the constitution because they are able to judge what the constitution says.

Also, the US Constitution leaves no room for improvement in times when law needs to be changed quickly and leaves the power to interpret what is constitutional in the hands of a small group of people. The constitution in the UK is found in a variety of sources which are mainly statute and common law, conventions and traditions, European law etc.

This was recently changed again so that after the hereditary line to the House of Lords stop after those currently there die. In the USA the whole constitution is on one document and all citizens have access to it. However if a codified constitution will introduce judicial tyranny then it defeats the object of reducing concentrated power.

Lastly introducing a codified system in the UK would bring the UK in line with most other modern democracies, especially with the European Union. It also means that individual liberty would be more securely protected by a codified constitution because it would be more clearly defined and easier to enforce in law.

Many people believe that having an uncodified constitution in the UK means that we have had a long history of democracy and changing to a codified constitution will jeopardise the democracy in the UK.

Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Get Access Should the UKs constitution remain uncodified? However in a codified constitution parliament could not pass any legislation that violates the constitution like the Human Rights act of This therefore means that changing to a codified constitution may turn out to undo a long history of work on democracy in the UK which is in fact completely unnecessary.

Currently in the UK the constitution is not easy to find which makes it difficult for the UKs citizens to learn the nature of the political system but also all the rights that as a citizen of the UK you should enjoy.

Members of the judiciary are also unelected which therefore means that they have no binding contract to the people to stand before them fairly and not to abuse the position that they have. This is because Parliament remains sovereign and no constitutional legislation can remove that sovereignty.

There are arguments for the UK to both retain an uncodified constitution and to change this to a codified constitution like the USA.

Another argument against codifying our constitution is that codified constitutions are often rigid. One of the main arguments for introducing a codified constitution is so that it might prevent the drift towards excessive executive power.The UK should retain its Constitution, aiding flexibility whilst observing democratic principles.

In comparison to the USA’s codified constitution, it is largely inflexible due to its political and legal system. The question then arises in this th anniversary year — should the UK now take steps to codify all its laws, rules and conventions governing the government of the country into one comprehensive document, ‘a new Magna Carta’?

Should Britain Retain Its Uncodified Constitution? The case for Britain retaining its uncodified constitution remains extremely strong. (25 marks) On the one hand it can be argued that Britain should not retain its uncodified constitution because it makes us unusual as only the UK, Israel and New Zealand do not have one.

Should the Uk Retain Its Uncodified Constitution Essay Should the UKs constitution remain uncodified?

A constitution is a set of rules which may be written or unwritten, establishes the distribution of power in a political system, the limits of government jurisdiction, the rights of citizens and the method of amending the constitution itself.

Should the UK remain as an uncodified constitution?

Should the UKs constitution remain uncodified? Essay Sample

A constitution is a set of rules that seek to establish the duties, powers and functions of the various. The case for Britain retaining its uncodified constitution remains extremely strong.

(25 marks) On the one hand it can be argued that Britain should not retain its uncodified constitution because it makes us unusual as only the .

Download
Should the uk retain its uncodified
Rated 0/5 based on 7 review