Mathilde is born into a family of clerks, lacks a dowry, is unable to perform any service, and, most important, lacks any expectations: She is thus destined to remain in her low station.
His stories would show less sympathy for their characters than did those of Anton Chekhov, another writer of his era with whom de Maupassant is often associated.
Deconstructionist critics might focus on the binary opposition between wealth and poverty, discussing how in this instance poverty is the preferred condition, because through poverty Mathilde sees that she was not poor in her previous circumstance.
By accepting an invitation to interact on a temporary basis with the members of the upper class, Mathilde complies with their requirements. De Maupassant sets a cynical tone early in the tale though his vocabulary choice: Some Marxist critics focus on power structures and control of one group by another based on material possessions.
Rather than physically revolting against her circumstances, however, Mathilde escapes her circumstances through fantasy, desiring the things that the upper classes possess and thereby accepting bourgeois values as her own.
Because women cannot work for success, they must depend upon the confines of marriage to advance their social standing, as Madame Forestier does.
He published almost three hundred stories written in the naturalist style before suffering a lingering illness and death from syphilis. Women succeed in this society only as fashion objects. Any regrets he holds are on behalf of his wife, whose misery greatly affects his existence.
A crucial symbol for feminist critics is the mirror in which Mathilde admires herself, which represents objectification. Marxist ideology promotes revolution by the working class, which see all surplus value extracted from the products of its labor for the benefit of the upper classes.
From Flaubert, de Maupassant learned that his job as a writer was to observe and then report common occurrences in an original way. De Maupassant provides no evidence of an epiphany that might demonstrate that Mathilde has learned or benefited in any way from her foolish actions.
However, readers may realize that her failure to take responsibility for her actions is the flaw that leads to her fall. In contrast, Monsieur Loisel is accepting of his social place. Her situation is untenable, as she can never become a part of the class she longs to join, but neither can she accept her own position.
His narrator acts as a nonjudgmental observer.Essay ideas, study questions and discussion topics based on important themes running throughout The Necklace by Guy De Maupassant.
Great supplemental information for school essays and homework projects. The Necklace study guide contains a biography of Guy de Maupassant, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.
About The Necklace The Necklace Summary. Oct 19, · Essay Prompts for "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupass October 21, - October 25, Weekly Agenda October 14, -.
The Necklace study guide contains a biography of Guy de Maupassant, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis. Is "The Necklace" a cynical story – does it reflect a really bleak and jaded view of life?
Does it have some other attitude towards life? Does "The Necklace" have a moral? Discussion Questions—“The Necklace” Name: _____ _____ English 9 Directions: Answer the questions below in complete sentences.Download